|
toganlinge (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
wait
how the eff did this comment get on here?? what?? is youtube malfunctioning??
toganlinge (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
oh damn
i thought i was replying on another video
sorry
brainwasher9876 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Though I feel that Heifetz's version had cleaner transitions and sound, Chang's version gave me a better appreciation at how difficult this piece is now that I am learning it:)
brainwasher9876 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
aren't you being hypocritical? What the hell does this have to do with this piece or sarah chang I wonder?
toganlinge (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
HAHAHA.
You're funny.
No, really.
I love reading these comments posted by idiots who think they know what they're doing.
brainwasher9876 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I've gotten the music for this and am super excited to play it though it is way above my level, which means I can cherish it and work on it longer:)
brainwasher9876 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
alright then. I'm sorry too. I didn't mean to flip out at people. It's just that whenever someone says something not totally agreeing with the piece his comment gets flamed. The internet turns the human spirit into a monster.
davehshs (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Sorry if my response to natm's post seemed rude. It wasn't intentional. I was just giving my take on where he seemed to be coming from. His apparent labeling of Sarah Chang's playing as "materialistic" made no sense at all and seemed to be a putdown of a musician whose soul-felt playing is anything but materialistic.
AHN5D (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Very obviously She is one of the greatest violinist alive.
brainwasher9876 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
for someone that age you seem rather rude. Everyone is free to their own interpretations. |