BlackenedChurches (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

My previous comment was designated in a sarcastic manner, referencing the implementations of Intelligent Design as the "true forms of blasphemy" and the denial of such practices in public schools as the "eliminator". The meaning I hope to convey with satanic doctrine is it is more beneficial and developmental that a Christianity bound way of life.

Matt482942 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

well, lol. i think they just want to teach science in science class. that means no satanic doctrine either, unless you consider science to be satanic

cloyd000 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

lol this is funny.

tbussard (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

No, not really. I made my account at the request of a friend. I'm also watching this video because it's interesting.

coasterpro (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"Good to see there are efforts to eliminate all forms of true blasphemy from classrooms today." That misses the point. This is about evidence, not belief. We're not replacing one belief with another, or expelling certain beliefs because we don't like them. We're simply ensuring that the scam artists that promote creationism under the guise of science are exposed. This serves the dual purpose of keeping our public schools secular and maintaining the integrity of science.

BlackenedChurches (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Good to see there are efforts to eliminate all forms of true blasphemy from classrooms today. It would be better to implement satanic doctrine into public schools over creationism.

ChemberlyDR (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"If we are going to teach creation science as an alternative to evolution, then we should also teach the stork theory as an alternative to biological reproduction"

YulieAna (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

What I meant to say that creationists mus believe that God created earth, regardless of their religion, whether it is Christianity, Islam or Judaism. I lot of people argue that creationism is a form of science which is nonesense, it has everything to do with religion.

Onithyr (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"How can you be a Christian an not believe that God created everything?" I am speaking of creationism (the belief that god poofed everything into being as they currently are) as opposed to theological evolution (the belief that god used evolution to create the diversity of life for him). One of the major differences is whether or not one accepts common descent. The majority of Christians accept the validity of common descent as there is so much evidence in support of it.

coasterpro (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"How can you be a Christian an not believe that God created everything?" Two things. First, you need to re-read the comment you're responding to because all it states is that not all creationists are Christian (ie. most belong to Islam and other religions). Second, the context of this discussion is biological evolution and so the term "creationist" is limited to that context. Of course Christians believe God created everything. But HOW he created it is the relevant question here.